Public sentiment is deeply negative, showing overwhelming compassion for the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza while expressing frustration and anger towards Israeli military actions and world leaders’ inaction. Many comments reflect a call for peace and a cessation of violence, emphasizing the humanitarian crisis affecting innocent civilians alongside sympathy for Israeli hostages. The discourse is charged with sadness, outrage, and a desire for justice, against a backdrop of perceived neglect by authorities.

Netanyahu's government

World leaders

###[Meta] Sticky Comment

[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.  

[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.

*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*

AutoModerator

LocalSignificant629

The diversions every 5 minutes by our shit media enables this.

cornbreadsdirtysheet

I would say that it's been obvious, but shine as much light on this as possible.  Advocate for journalists to be allowed into Gaza.  The world needs to see images and video of what is happening on the ground.

bhenghisfudge

Not to kill as many people as possible, but to stay in power. Netanjahu wouldn't be in power (and maybe in prison) without that war. He doesn't really care about his people or the people in Gaza, he cares just about his own gain.

ConsistentAd7859

The fact that they denied the famine for weeks despite thousands of pieces of evidence in 4K showing Palestinians skin and bones dying of starvation, only to finally say, "Okay, there is indeed a famine" the second Hamas posted a video of severely emaciated Israeli hostages, proves once again that Israelis do not consider Palestinians as human beings and that this is indeed a genocide.

Shaami_learner

My take on this is that the two fake spats with Iran recently were both staged to enable the Gaza slaughter to continue

Magic__E

Prolonging the war also keeps Netanyahus fragile government together.

With out the conflict, Netanyahus would be done in israeli politics - and would have to face his looming corruption charges.

So there are both political and ideological reasons to keep the war going - and perpetrating a full scale genocide and massive human suffering. And mostly just because Bibi is vain and wants to stay in power.

PoulCastellano

It's so obvious that genocide was always their desire, the Zionists who really run Israel. And they have so much pull that the world mostly stands by with their hands in their pockets.
Ditto for multiple African slaughters. We hardly even hear about them. 
Thanks for posting about this. We can't forget our brothers and sisters, we all come from the same place we're all family. 

Andre-italiano

"They voted for this" say the Israelis. "They voted for this" is what I say about Israelis.

There is no doubt that that Israeli government is engaged in genocide with the full support of the Israeli people. They are convinced that they will get away with it. The world will move on, and anybody who mentions Gaza will be labeled an antisemite while the Israelis steal the land and the natural gas deposits off the coast of Gaza.

Ornery_Cookie_359

I agree with you but I think there's an additional point to make.


It's also about inflicting a trauma on the collective psyche of the population. It's how the masses are controlled. 


WW1, WW2, COVID, Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Gaza... these are the big ones which impact the global psyche. There's also the managed decline of the global economy, which puts the average person in a financially precarious situation. Then things like ICE raids and other indicators of the rising tide of fascism. Even if it doesn't affect your country right now, it doesn't mean it's not coming.


When people are fearful, anxious and stressed out, they are more vulnerable to psychological manipulation. War propaganda is an extremely potent tool to manipulate the masses.

pharmamess

This is just fact, it’s a genocide not a war

nicenyeezy

The pace is slow because it's better they bury their own dead rather than allowing mountains of bodies to show in satellite pictures.

Adora77

Accurate_Welder_3662

Finally someone saying it. Writing it. No conspiracy here. Just a fact. World we are living in.

Striking-Ad-6557

I just saw a short on YouTube of a captive Israeli under Hamas and he looked starved. Starved to the extent of the children we see dying everyday from the same plite. The Israeli officials were out crying their poor captives condition and all I could think was, "hey fucktards how the fuck are they supposed to feed their prisoners when you won't let them have ANY FUCKING FOOD." The fucking ignorance bro it's astounding

Educational-Hall1525

MysteriousBrystander

gohokies06231988

And people just let them. They will forever been seen as “victims” because of the Holocaust, so people believe they can never do wrong.

RennietheAquarian

I would add that the killing of children and women is even more targeted as they see the population growth as an issue for them. They willingly target children and women to reduce those numbers and directly affect the future of the Palestinian people

Training-Run-1307

Switch “Israel” with “America” and you begin to see the full picture.

No one makes more $ than the US does while funding war. Simple as that.

L0lligag

Israel could just kill everyone there and be done with it. There’s literally no one who could that would be willing to straight up try and stop them. It would benefit no country to interfere. Only thing that stops Israel from doing this is Israel.  

I don’t think enough people understand how hard it is to not kill everyone. It takes 5x the amount of soldiers and 10x the logistics to weed through the people you’re not trying to kill. 

There’s a reason back in the day let’s go with the Mongolians just exterminating an entire population. It was way easier to do, and guess what you didn’t have to worry about rebellion, revenge, or restitution. 

First world countries don’t do that. Because they have a rebuilding process in mind after the war is over. Break em down build them back up. Not that this method always works, it’s considered more moral and is great when it does workout. 

But back to the original point. It takes a lot more effort to purge an enemy force out of a territory, while not killing every civilian in that territory. You can look at Iraq or Afghanistan the US was not trying to kill everyone there(Still lots of civilians died, but that was not the goal, why we call it collateral damage). If we were trying to kill everyone the war would have been far more easy to accomplish with that objective.

BlackMoonValmar

I have a conspiracy that some of the wars the point isnt to win its just to kill people. I don't mean the belligerent parties, I mean the people who fund either side or both sides seem to just relish the high death counts and human suffering.

fainofgunction

No one is being deported, that’s never been their goal. They are doing an ethnic cleansing and are open about that.

Witchy_bimbo

No-Tomatillo-6709

bhgrove

CNN 7-29-2025: Arab and Muslim states including Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have for the first time issued a joint call for [Hamas](https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/25/politics/donald-trump-israel-hamas-war) to disarm and relinquish power in the Gaza Strip as part of efforts to end the war in the territory.

The 22-member Arab League, the entire European Union and another 17 countries backed a declaration signed at a United Nations conference co-hosted by Saudi Arabia and France on Tuesday.

[https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/30/middleeast/arab-league-hamas-gaza-israel-intl](https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/30/middleeast/arab-league-hamas-gaza-israel-intl)

OldAdvertising5963

What makes this starvation situation more despicable than others is there is a mountain of food &amp; supplies that is staged in the area just sitting there waiting to be brought in. Israeli officials tell lies saying they are't preventing help for civilians. This situation is upsetting but if I were a Jew I'd be absolutely livid about Israeli leaders giving the world legitimate reason to be antisemitic. 

ThisHandleTooHot

Everyone underestimates how difficult a guerrilla force is for a traditional army to defeat. The Palestinian resistance forces (which include, but is not exclusive too Hamas) have been preparing for this kind of situation for the last 20 years. Israel take on causalities from this resistance every day. They have a massive recruitment problem, the point that they've been wanting to draft the previously exempt ultra orthodox, and seem to be ineffective at doing anything besides murdering civilians. Even in the "Israeli controlled" Kahn Yunis, multiple ambushes on their soldiers have been occurring basically every week. People over estimate the strength of Israel and underestimate the strength of the Palestinian resistance. I genuinely don't think the IDF is capable of conquering Gaza, its already taken on thousands of causalities and completely tarnished its international reputation. The Houthi blockade caused its red sea port to shut down. They have civil unrest at the moment, and even European countries are pretending to support Palestine to try and quell their own civil unrest.

Isreal can't conquer Gaza. They are failing. They will continue to fail. They have dropped the equivalent of five nukes on an area smaller than London. They have decimated the leadership of Hamas. But they will not be able to defeat the resistance. Believing that they can plays into their propaganda, and makes people more likely to lose hope.

ThePlacidAcid

Funny that the Zionist controlled UN is about to propose the two state solution in September..

Let that sink in....

astronot24

Imagine the actual death stats for children there.... it's all you can do, because "they" will never be honest about it.

Anonymous_exodus

This isn't even a conspiracy.  This is the MO of Zionism; they wanted a casus belli to make Gaza unlivable, to shrug their shoulders and say "Oh well, I guess they'll have to live somewhere else and we might as well re-settle this land!  A shame for it to go to waste!"

Deliberate targeting of critical infrastructure, hospitals, schools, art centers, under flimsy excuses.  Meanwhile, settler violence in the West Bank is rising, and they are approving more and more illegal settlements.

In a few years, Zionism (a far right radical nationalist ideology that oppresses a particular ethnicity and uses them as a scapegoat for all of their problems... hmmmmm sounds familiar) will be condemned in the same breath as another political movement that has a Z in it.

Background_Drag5982

People in these comments scapegoating Netanyahu when any single PM would be doing the same. Their elections are shams, and their PMs are all moving israel to the same goal just at different rates. Progressive leaders are assassinated, and the far right coalitions outnumber the opposition greatly

The goal has always been greater israel, and in the future they’ll have invaded Lebanon (again) on pretenses of fighting Hezbollah. Then they’ll invade Syria to fight the very coalition government they financed to overthrow Assad. In fact, they’re already doing so to “protect” the Druze - while annexing the regions containing the water supply of course.

Israel is an evil nation, the closest thing we have to a modern day German Nazi regime. They’re Jewish white supremacists.

Serious-Top7925

Congratulations you have earned yourself another star on your Tinfoil hat there soldier. You have finally joined the ranks of us who have come to realize this and that this is way more than just a land grab. They want to obliterate their neighbors and give them no chance to survive. There are no innocents to them. You don’t see the opposition chanting death to Israel because they are blood thirsty animals. They chant it because if they don’t stop Israel their own way of life and homes will be history. Cause Israel is like a Rich abusive father that gaslights you into letting them do what they want.

Toasterdosnttoast

Of course this is well known. They are deliberately killing as many children as they can, that’s genocide.

ShockFabulous7421

The Palestinian resistance has proven to be more resilient than Israel anticipated. For one there is nowhere to "clear them out to" The Arab world despite their cowardice believe a complete ethnic cleansing of the strip is a bridge to far. Also Israel, despite their endless lies and war crimes, wants to still pretend they have the most moral army in the world and are not how they are perceived to the international community. So they're doing this slow motion grinding down genocide, they believe they can get away with. Also the IDF, despite their numbers and high tech equipment, are actually not good at fighting. As was the case in other wars of conscripts fighting guerilla fighters with more heart and nothing to lose, such as how the US was defeated in Vietnam. They got their asses kicked on the ground when they tried to invade Lebanon. What they're good at is bombing and destructions of civilians and civilian infrastructure, which is what they've done relentlessly. They've killed close to half a million people, dropping more explosions equivalent to nuclear bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yet they still havent been able to complete their objectives, so they're going full Holocaust trying to starve them out. As mentioned Benzion Mileikowsky, born in Poland and raised in Pennsylvania, or Netanyahu as he calls himself. Is hellbent on staying in power. So he needs the war to continue to maintain his far-right coalition and stay out of jail for corruption.

jefe4959

IsKFCopen

If they really wanted to kill as many Gazans as possible they’d conquer/clear it. 

🙄

Sir_Viva

Hamas lets hostages free = war over. Simple as that.

trogjc

How about Hamas release the hostages, they are continuing the war they don't care about Gazan citizens

sheppo42

Kwopp

zen_mofo

Moloch will not be satiated until he's sipping loosh on the beach at the Trump Gaza Hotel &amp; Resort.

Raynstormm

How many IDF have been killed lately, I have not seen\herd of one so it tells me there is no one left shooting back.

Affectionate-Stay430

Hamas is artificially prolonging the war to kill as many people as possible

also, I think the number is less than half that 

Lisa d

Lsdnyc

does every fucking post on here  have to be about Israel or Jews?  its so fucking boring at this point, Jesus fucking thirst STFU, I don't support Israel or anything, but the constant crying about it is fucking tiresome as hell.

WTF.  Just shut up and think about something else for a few days.  Holy shit.

SedonaVortex

Israel is trying to gain full military control, but the Gazans have a very effective guerilla force whose goal is to extend the war of attrition and whittle away at Israel's support from within the US. This is the only way possible for them to shift the power dynamics in the region, and they are willing to make huge sacrifices in order to do so. 

It seems crazy to first worlders, but if someone stole your land and was living a US-subsidized first world lifestyle on it, you might do the same.

iamblicus000

BrotatoChip04

Fair.


Hamas was attacking a music festival to kill as many people as possible.


Enjoy being bombed, Terrorist scum.

2moreX

If they wanted to kill as many people as possible, why don't they bomb Palestine 24/7?

valiumonaplane

One question: where is the difference im doing it in 2 month or +2 years if the plan is to kill the most? Can't you just kill the most in 2 month operation?

RizzKiller

isaacF85

You might be underestimating the capabilities Hamas. They have had a lot of time and money planning this war.

Bandaka

fmfan23

/u/PloppingSmock (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.

All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed [here](/r/DeltaLog/comments/1l9v7jh/deltas_awarded_in_cmv_the_only_likely_end_to_the/), in /r/DeltaLog.

Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.

^[Delta System Explained](https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/wiki/deltasystem) ^| ^[Deltaboards](https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/wiki/deltaboards)

DeltaBot

Since nobody seemed to read the actual post where OP said This is NOT a discussion of the morality and bothered trying to change their view, I'll chime in.

I don’t think Gaza’s total destruction is the only likely outcome—just the most extreme one. A more natural and historically consistent outcome is that, over time, the Palestinian population adapts. Romantic arguments about “you can’t kill an idea” make for great slogans, but history shows people abandon causes when the costs become generationally unsustainable.

Eventually—maybe after a couple more cycles of war and displacement—the dominant will likely shift from resistance to survival. That could mean accepting a much smaller, weaker, and more fragmented version of a state—far worse than what was on the table in 1948, 1967, Oslo, 2005, or 2008. Not because it's fair, but because it’s what’s left.

Obsidian1000

I'm a lot more optimistic than yourself. Here are few things to consider -   
1) At least currently, the rate of death/removal of land isn't compatible with "wiping out Gaza". That is not to say that there aren't a lot of dead Palestinians and that is not to say that any life of a single Palestinian person aren't valuable - just that for more than a year now there are more Palestinians born in Gaza than Palestinians that died, and this is when you include Hamas militants in the calculation.  Same goes for Palestinians that left Gaza. At the start of the war a meaningful amount left, but after that not so many.  
This is not to diminish the suffering or anything, just to say that for your end to be the "likely" end, we would have to see a significant increase in those parameters.   
  
2) Majority of Israelis have showed in polls consistent support for the end of the war - and this majority grows as time progresses. (I know, some people in the comments would want to bring the one outlier poll with the poor methodology about the 82%, this is not how statistics work). This is already seen in Israel reducing the number of reservists they enlist, because many of them simply don't want to come for a war they want to end. This makes the increase from (1) significantly less likely - there is no internal support for such a move. That being said - the current Israeli gov (which according to polls loses by a large margin to its opposition) still has about a year+ left in office.

3) Lastly, IDK how close you follow the news, but there are some signs that Hamas loses its power completely. Some of these signs include the PA saying worse and worse things about Hamas (for the first time they said that October 7 was horrible), there are armed militias (that Israel helped arm - something that isn't consistent with occupying Gaza btw) that openly go against Hamas, and the Gazan protests against Hamas continue. The weaker Hamas are, the less commanders they have remaining, the better the offers that Israel is likely to get. Currently, any offer that was put on the table had Hamas remaining in some capacity in Gaza. Once this is gone - ideally it's easier to push Hamas to relinquish power and give back the hostages. If this happens - it's really hard to justify the continuation of the war - both to the Israeli public (that its opinions matter) and to the US. 

4) Lastly, notice that there are reports in recent days about Trump saying to Netanyahu he wants to see an end the war soon. Seems like Trump went back from his riviera plan.

comeon456

Why would that end the conflict?

The West Bank would still be a source of contention, and enough former-Gazian Palestinians live overseas to cause trouble at some future point.

The only end to the conflict is a diplomatic one, where both sides make concessions and find agreement over common grounds. Unfortunately, the leadership on both sides is probably going to have to change before this becomes a possibility—but it's still the only real resolution; anything else is just a pause while one side or the other regroups.

Wheloc

A one state solution is possible. Everyone can live together under a free, fair, democratic country. 

Israel supported and tolerated the religious groups that became Hamas. Their goal was to allow the religious extremist groups to gain power to squash the secular Palestinian Liberation movement. 

This just ended with the fight for Palestinians in gaza being tied to religious extremism. Which was great PR for Israel. 

However, it's not true. These are real people, both in Gaza and in Israel, who just want to live their lives. They could easily live in harmony. 

Jews, Muslims, and Christians lived together in the area for centuries. The modern conflicts began after the rise of Zionism, and specifically the Balfour declaration, where the British promised the Palestinians a nation if they revolted against ottomon rule, and they also promised the same area to Zionists for a Jewish state. Then European settlers started coming and in displacing natives from their homes and villages. That's when the fighting started. 

It's not impossible for them to coexist. 

This can be ended by a state where all people have equal rights, instead of the apartheid system that is currently set up. 

The issues that prevent that: 
The right of return. Palestinians aren't given the right of return to their ancestral homelands, but Jewish people who's families haven't lived their for millenia are given that right. 

Ethnonationalism: Israel is a Jewish state. That automatically puts a certain group in a higher social status than the others 

Mutual mistrust and trauma: the decades of fighting will leave lasting scars that need to be addressed to be able to allow healing. 

I don't see a reason why these issues would prevent them from being able to live together. They're certainly much better than genocide.

mddnaa

Since the prompt is to set morality aside, the simplest way to refute this is to mention that wiping out Israel would also end the conflict. Maybe some hypothetical where Iran or Russia infiltrates their nukes and sets them off in their silos?

A more realistic option though is to get peace partners on both sides. Maybe after all of this carnage, Palestinians oust Hamas (there are already protests going on now). Then, without Hamas as a boogie man, the Israeli far right loses their appeal/seats/power. Maybe whoever replaces Netanyahu and Hamas are both so sick of the carnage that they finally make a lasting peace.

Not sure how likely that is, but I think that could happen. It would require a lot of sacrifice from both sides though.

TJaySteno1

Generally speaking, Israel is willing to make peace.  They have long term peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan.  They just recently negotiated a ceasefire with Lebanon.  

For gaza, there is one non-negotiable requirement, and one likely requirement to peace.  Fulfilling both would probably avert the complete destruction you anticipate.  

Non-negotiable:

The hostages simply have to be returned.  Israel is not going to agree to any peace treaty that leaves hostages in the hands of Hamas to star in some future snuff video.  

That’s not even just a Netanyahu thing.  Even if he is removed from power, any government that takes its place would have to get the hostages returned before ending the war. 

Note that any “peace first, then the hostages get returned” is not going to work.  The war will continue until the hostages or their bodies are recovered.  There is simply no way for it to end before then. 



Likely requirement:

Hamas probably cannot remain as the government.  Unlike the hostages, I think there is some wiggle room on this one.  But, most likely, Israel would prefer war than allow Hamas, which has promised to launch a similar massacre in the future, to stick around.  

So, can the conflict end without the destruction of gaza?   For sure!   They will have to return the hostages and probably surrender unconditionally. Gaza may choose mass death over surrender, Japan almost did that in WW2, but it doesn’t have to happen that way.

Knave7575

Is part of your belief that Hamas will never surrender and never accept a Jewish state alongside itself?

Ok_Owl_5403

I'm relieved that your post isn’t cheering for Gaza’s destruction - it’s wrestling with the fear that it might be the only end left. That sense of inevitability is what I want to gently challenge.

There’s a bitter irony here. The last time a superpower ended a major war with overwhelming force was America dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was framed as a necessary horror to stop a greater one, and it did end the war.

Fast forward to Gaza: over the past 18 months, more explosive force than both atomic bombs combined - an estimated 60+ kilotons, has been dropped on one of the most crowded civilian areas in the world.

But it hasn’t ended Hamas. It hasn’t ended the conflict. The suffering has multiplied, and peace feels more distant.

If annihilation worked, we’d already have peace.

What actually ended WWII wasn’t just devastation - it was what followed. America didn’t just flatten Japan - they rebuilt it, invested in it, and created the conditions for peace.

That’s never been done for Gaza.

If we truly want an end, maybe the answer is world leaders finding their humanity and investing in justice, not perpetual wars and the kind of peace that is supposedly going to exist when Gaza becomes  apartheid apartments by the sea, built on the rubble of an unmarked graveyard for children.

throwawayfem77

[deleted]

That would be contrary to a now seventy year piles of evidence of how these things generally go.

A more logical and likely outcome is a partial depopulation of the area, with an exodus to nearby regions that encompasses a substantial part of the population, with the utter collapse of any organized Palestinian command, or its reorganization around the handful of people controlling what aide is given, or the ability to take it by force.

It is unlikely that Hamas in its pre-war form will be in that role, but entirely possible that different factions of it change the label or take over different parts of it.     Its also possible that a new violent extremist group emerges with a decisive edge in internal violence use, and uses its lack of track record to be considered a temporary benign influence to the Useful Idiot class of the West. 

This isn't ethnic cleansing, it isn't genocide,  it is a rinse and repeat political pogrom, that likely will be revisited over and over for the rest of our lifetimes, until the Palestinians forsake violence.

ErieHog

Okay. While I think the ending you’ve suggested is possible, I also think it’s far from likely. Here are my reasons.

1.) Israel doesn’t want to become a pariah state. There are definitely some Israeli far-right politicians who don’t care what foreign states think of Israel, but that’s not yet the majority. And while Netanyahu has snubbed the President on occasion, it’s a thin line. 

Without American and European support, Israel would be dramatically weakened. They might be the strongest state in the region now, but a few decades down the line? Who knows. Level heads in the IDF of all places probably understand the threat international isolation poses better than Ben Gvir and his imbecilic posse.

2.) It’s too much money to continue the war indefinitely. Some kind of diplomatic agreement has to be reached, because total mobilization isn’t cheap.



The most likely solution, in my view, is another partial occupation/full occupation and a truce, not with Hamas but with some kind of puppet Palestinian authority. Kicking this can down the road has become an Israeli specialty at this point.

byzantiu

Hamas could surrender.

That always been an option. That prevent it.

Surrender has always been an option for Palestinian that they refuse to take. Take the L that they lost the war (and such lost major political capital) and decide to move on with their lives rather than try to take back what they lost.

If we take the premise that Hamas would rather all of Gaza burn then surrender to Israel, then yeah you're correct. Probably war will end with Gaza destruction.

But do you accept that premise that Palestrina people prefer death to surrender.

SnooOpinions5486

What does "wipe out" entail?
98% of Palestinians are still there after 2 years of war.


So infrastructure? Political system? Economy?

biteme4711

I will continue base on the assumption that you are only pointing out that Israel wants to complete the genocide and occupy the Gaza strip and other Palestinian lands, not endorsing or supporting their action.

* Politically speaking, Israel will most likely continue their effort because there is no opposing forces, thanks to the US' constant nays at the Security Council, if it was not Israel but another country with no lobbists paying US politicians, that country would have been bombed to oblivion two years ago.
* Militarily speaking, while Houthis are still launching missiles at Israel, but TBH it's only a nuisance at this point, and it will continue to be, base on the distance and all the arab countries that are not too keen on helping Palestine.
* Economically speaking, Israel has what it takes to keep going, of course I'm refering to the US tax dollars, while Palestine has next to nothing.
* Culturally speaking, Israel now shares the reputation of the Third-Reich and Militarist Imperial Japan, so they can't go lower, so nothing is holding them back in this regard.

It's likely Israel will continue down this path, but there is hope --

1. US will come to its senses when they realize Israel is becoming too strong in that region and starts to hurt their profit. (Not the first time, look at Al-Qaeda, Saddam Hussein, Taliban, Iran, Libyan rebels, Syrian rebels, the list goes on)
2. nternational pressure, shifting regional alliances, and global public opinion can create new dynamics that force Israel and its ally to stop.
3. Palestinian people’s resilience and the broader Arab and international solidarity movements continue to exert pressure, demanding justice and a sustainable resolution.

In short, while the current trajectory appears grim, complex geopolitical realities and historical precedents suggest that total annihilation is not the only possible end. Change—though difficult—remains within the realm of possibility.

CanadianGangsta

I unfortunately think your view is not... unlikely, but we have to keep in mind that past peace breakthroughs in the region also were unfathomable before they actually occurred. Nobody thought peace between Egypt and Israel would ever be possible before the brave, extended campaign on the part of Egyptian leadership to normalize relations.

It certainly isn't guaranteed, but a unified leadership on the palestinian side, willing to embrace peace and negotiate in good faith, and with the backing of the international community could force israel into a position where they *must* negotiate peace. I have my disagreements with Israeli leadership, but historically Israel has pretty astutely responded to the political realities on the ground, whether or not those aligned with their (often distasteful) political aspirations. 

if, by some miracle, a coherent palestinian leadership emerged that was dead-set on peace, it is not unlikely that Israel would have to negotiate a peace agreement with them - just like Jordan, Egypt, and now even Saudi Arabia

I think that with proper public pressure, the US and European governments will eventually have to do less and less for Israel, until Israel is forced to make peace.

Israel’s unpopularity and waning support will eventually make it collapse.

So the only way to stop a genocide is to let the people be completely destroyed and finish the genocide? Great insight sis 🤣

rkhatri

I'll take this one step further:
The only way to achieve true peace on earth is for the human species to be wiped out entirely.

TwilightFate

If America stops giving weapons to Israel the war will end

Invinciblez_Gunner

It depends what you mean by "the annihilation of Gaza". Large swathes of the strip have been reduced to rubble at this point, and Israel is certainly in favor of large scale emigration of Gazans from the strip. I don't think they'd have the political backing to carry out forced expulsions, but you can argue that the systematic destruction of infrastructure in the strip is a tacit endorsement of ethnic cleansing (and it's not hard to find hardcore voices in Israel who proudly call for that and worse).

If what you mean by "annihilation of Gaza" is that all 2 million residents will be killed, that's nowhere near a reality. The death toll in this conflict is far below the death toll in the Russia/Ukraine war, or many other conflicts in recent history, in raw numbers. The impact on civilians is egregious, and the fact that civilians haven't been able to flee is somewhat unprecedented. When all the dust settles, and the full death toll is tabulated, I don't know if it would reach double digits in terms of percentages (ie; &gt;10%). That's just a death toll - not a casualty toll, or a psychological trauma toll.

What would it take for Israel to end the war? Bibi wants to end the war with what is seen as a decisive victory. As it stands, Israel has largely dismantled Hamas's military capabilities and commanders. They've destroyed Hezbollah, and are eyeing possible normalization of ties with Syria.  Meanwhile, there's a huge focus in Israel in dismantling Iran's nuclear program, which requires freeing up additional military resources. There's also a strong pressure internally in Israel to wrap up the war in Gaza - the economic toll is huge, the diplomatic toll has been enormous, Israelis broadly prioritize returning the hostages, and there's increasing political pressure to bring the war to an end. For example, you mentioned Trump - while it's true that America won't stop providing arms to Israel, Trump also wants to be seen as a peacemaker, and has been exerting pressure on Israel recently to bring the war to a close and declare victory.

I think you can expect that the two sides will sign an agreement somewhat soon, under the proposed "Witkoff plan". That would lead to 10 living hostages freed over the course of 60 days, and the final living hostages' release to be negotiated pending a full end to the war. Israel might make a big push to get Gazans to leave for other countries, but even if 1 million people leave (which is unlikely - nobody wants to accept Gazan refugees, especially on mass), there will still be 1 million people living in the strip.

Over the coming decade, there will be an enormous amount of money poured into reconstruction efforts. There are billions of people around the world who want to donate money to that cause, and every country in the middle east would benefit from a stable and prosperous Gaza. Obviously, that's not possible with Hamas in control, but the current deals on the table would theoretically see Hamas cede control. The political future of the conflict is uncertain, but the continued existence of Gaza is not. 

Happy to provide citations for anything you have questions about here.

MostlyAffable

So you have accepted now that a two state solution is not sustainable, and it never was, not when once side refuses to live peacefully in coexistence. I’m glad. 

You later stated ‘a one state solution with equal rights seems great but does not seem likely in the near future’ I’m not sure if this is just genuine lack of knowledge or naiveness but I’ll go with the first. There is a one state, that has offered a tremendous number of solutions, that offers equal rights for all citizens irregardless of race, religion, political views, sex or sexual orientation - This is called the state of Israel. Where 2 million Arabs live peacefully in coexistence, more so they are in the Knesset, they are all doctors or bankers or high court judges.

StartMiddle

Human brains seek simple, easily understood solutions to complex problems. Real life is hardly ever so simple. 

Israel has already pretty much destroyed most of Gaza so you're correct there. But I think the idea that Gazans will be relocated or killed is not realistic. On relocation - there is nowhere for them to go. Egypt will not have them in Sinai. Its not practical in any way. And on extermination... also not really realistic.

Despite the brutality of this war only a small fraction of Gazans are dead. There is a very very large gap I between war with heavy civilian casualties and systemic extermination. Gazans are still having babies. The current pace of the war, devastating as it is, can continue for a very very long time without resulting in extermination. 

The fact is that there is really no gain for Israel in extermination. That would only radicalize Palestinians in Israel and the West Bank and move the conflict elsewhere. Israel knows that there is no realistic solution in which they do not still have to deal with a substantial Palestinian population in territories they control. 

Extermination doesn't suit their interests. Domination does. There will be a harsh occupation and strict apartheid-style laws for the foreseeable future. They believe they cannot live peacefully with Palestinians and cannot exterminate then either, so they aim to control them as closely as possible.

Prince_Marf

With all due respect, your comments reflect deep ignorance about the social structure of the Palestinian territories. Further, your comments suggest a significant disconnect between your media diet and current events in Gaza. 

In the Palestinian territories, a small number of clans (essentially extended families, but the concept not completely analogous) hold tremendous social and political power. In the past few weeks, three different clans in Gaza have denounced Hamas and begun working with Israel in opposition to Hamas. This is a significant turning point in the war.

If the clans are able (with the help if Israel) overthrow Hamas, they will replace Hamas as the governing body of Gaza.

Was that the solution for slavery of black people in America or South Africa?

Seems like equal rights tend to be the most likely if we go by history.

Unless you think jews are some special kind of evil

Giardian_of_Israel

If it's okay to be this existential then lets get rid of Israel by stopping all its funding. The West has thrown so much money into making this barbaric and unnatural project work but all it would take to make it fall is let go and let gravity do its work. 

DustyFalmouth

Total genocide of Gaza won't end the war. Once Gaza is empty the West Bank will be next. They're already running operations there and the leadership of the West Bank *has* recognized Israels right to exist.

After they empty the West Bank they move on the Jordan and Sinai. Remember, the Israeli right believes Israel should stretch from the Nile to the Euphrates.

So sure, you can take the morality questions out of it. But your question in inherently flawed because whether you empty out Gaza or not it still won't end the conflict.

Acceptable-Fig2884

Not to be a doomer but it’s entirely possible with the recent evacuation of US military families and Israeli/American intel talking about a strike on Iran, that this could escalate into a regional if not global conflict. If Iran decides to bomb US military bases or Saudi oil fields and tank the oil market it would almost certainly mean US intervention. Considering Iran is allied with China/Russia it’s very possible they would supply weapons and even military support to protect their interests with Iran

Confident-Football-2

I am looking at it in the following way:

  
1. Israel can't murder 2M people in Gaza, it would make them pariahs for the rest of their existence, which wouldn't be long when arabs finally attack it and Western countries turn a blind eye.

2. Israel can't occupy Gaza forever, it's just too expensive for a 10M nation to occupy 2M Gazans.

3. Israel can either withdraw - and return to pre-October 7 status, which doesn't make a lot of sense to do.

4. Or push all Palestinians from Gaza - the best scenario for Israel. But if Palestinians won't leave, then we come back to point #1 (Israel can't kill all of them), then point #2, and finally to point #3 (Israel must withdraw because it can't afford)

So, if Palestinians don't move away and suffer for some time, Israel will withdraw.

ScrupulousArmadillo

Hamas could always just release the hostages and surrender.

Cyan_Kurokawa_

Frankly, the most likely scenario is as follows:

1. UN and international diplomatic pressure force Israel to agree to the Hamas terms: Israel to pull out and Hamas pinky-promises to release the hostages afterward.
2. Israel pulls out.  Hamas releases some but not all of the hostages.  Hamas comes up with some lame excuse like "the hostages converted to Islam" or "we can't find them."
3. Israel complains about its hostages and Hamas' failure to abide by the deal.  Nobody listens or cares.

3a. Hamas shoots off a few dozen rockets into Israel in celebration and to show it is not under control and as a symbol the fight goes on.  Israel is pressured not to retaliate.  It might, it might not, either way is purely symbolic.

4.  International aid pours in to rebuild Gaza.  Iran, Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood, and other groups continue to send military supplies to Hamas.

5.  5-7 years from now, Hamas breaks the ceasefire and attempts "Al Aqsa Flood 2." Once again, Muslims and Leftists around the world gather to celebrate the beginning of war and the gruesome murders.

6.  Israel invades Gaza again, reminding the world that its hostages have been in captivity for over a decade, now.  Once again, Gazan civilians refuse to evacuate and the "Pro-Palestine" countries refuse to accept any refugees anyway.

7. No matter how Israel responds or to what extent, the UN and international left will restart the histrionics and label its actions "genocidal."  Pressure mounts on Israel to accept another "ceasefire" which will almost certainly be broken within a few years.

8.  Rinse, Repeat, Ad Infinitum.

XhazakXhazak

I think Israel will take all of Gaza and people will be shipped elsewhere eventually. 

But the US will not support Israel for much longer (less than 20 years?) as more and more young people are trained in thinking that all physical conflict is unjustifiable. 

The young and even most millennials today don’t believe in peace through strength

Moonwrath8

Wiped out? Logistically and optically too expensive.  Rather - likely reduced to about 20% of the land in tightly controlled enclaves with a barely functional economy that causes a majority of the population to eventually leave.  And that 20% will be heavily monitored and checkpointed, like West Bank. The 80% of land left over will be military reserve for Israel with anti-tunnel measures, and land given to settlers.  

No-Dinner-5894

There is always the possibility of a collapse of the Israeli government; if the ruling coalition somehow breaks apart, there's a chance that their replacement will seek to end the war in the interest of making a clean break. Particularly, the ultra-orthodox parties have been increasingly vocal members of the coalition, with their protests against the possibility of ultra-orthodox men being drafted into the IDF. 

But that would only really be a stopgap measure. The current state of affairs, even if the fighting stopped tomorrow, is unsustainable. Barring an actual miracle or the complete collapse of Israel as a state, Israel will eventually absorb Gaza and the West Bank; the only real question is whether there will be anyone left when they do.

Doc_Mercury

The likely end to the conflict is that Israel trades Gaza for Iran. Israel bombs Iranian nuclear reactors, but ends the war in Gaza. 

Israel will accept this because they view Iran as the bigger threat and ultimate funder of Hamas. They'll get to Hamas eventually. 

Hamas will accept it, because they need the war to end so they can stabilize their control on Gaza and regroup. 

America will accept it, because it ends the Gaza war while removing the threat of a nuclear Iran. 

(The Iranian people will accept it if it means the overthrow of the Mullahs, well see if that happens.)

The only real losers are Palestinians, who are still under Hamas dictatorship.

Technical-King-1412

Maybe the destruction of Israel would be more likely

ArcangelLuis121319

Gaza will be occupied, and large parts of it will be destroyed but not necessarily wiped out. If Genocide was the intent, the civilian death toll is too low, considering how destructive modern weapons are. The most likely answer is that Gaza will be occupied indefinitely while Israel or another Arab country administers the region and rebuilds civilian infrastructure and economy.

Under current conditions, a two-state solution is impossible. It will only ever become possible when extremist ideology is wiped out.

1ncest_is_wincest

Jews were once expelled from the same location, and this has not ended the conflict in the region. Diaspora groups always carry the memories and stories of their land of origin and will feel a pull towards it. They will export their conflicts and act them out in immigrant neighbourhoods. As for the Israelis, the oppressed have become the oppressor. History repeats itself. The Middle East will be forever cursed with this conflict. 

The only solution is mass conversion to Van Halen.

Popular_Ad_4934

I agree with everything except one thing. They will not massacre the palestinians to a man. Right now 1% of the civilian population has been killed. We are a long way off from killing off the palestinians in Gaza. If Egypt doesnt open its border i dont see them going anywhere else. In that case they will probably be hoarder into southern Gaza and kept there. They said before that Gaza is an open air prison, but i think we havent seen anything yet....

FitDeal325

I agree. I don’t see this ending any other way, especially given the people in power.

I will take it a step further and say my tin foil hat take. I think Israel knew about the Oct. 7 Hamas attack and chose to ignore it. They knew it was a prime opportunity to take over Gaza once and for all. The military over there is far too advanced for them to of not known about Hamas falling out of the sky.

Zestypalmtree

I think it's fairly obvious that this war will be over once Hamas has been removed from power. If Hamas continues to refuse to return the hostages and surrender unconditionally, then the destruction will continue.  But I don't see anything that justifies the contention that Gaza will be wiped out "entirely."

Other peoples have weathered wars. The Palestinians will, too.

flossdaily

Actually the only way for the conflict to end is to

A) arrest Netanyahu and his administration for war crimes
B) remove every settler and put them on trial for war crimes.
C) implement 2 state solution


What you're describing is literally just genocide.

BatmanxX420X

The Prodestant vs Catholic conflicts in Ireland. Violence happened between the two groups for hundreds of years and the last conflict lasted 30 years. Some people back then had the opinion that the conflicts would never end but peace has lasted there today. You can never know what will happen in the future. It may not happen right now, but things do change.

Godlesspants

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plans for a military takeover of Gaza have raised concerns of escalating violence and humanitarian crises.

Israel Gaza Conflict

Why This Matters

Public Sentiment Summary

Highlighted Comments

Parties Involved

What the people want